How to buy Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd (XTSM) in United States

To cash out of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd in United States, the first step is to transfer your tokens to a cryptocurrency exchange that supports withdrawals into fiat currency. Once your Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd is deposited into your exchange wallet, you can place a sell order. Depending on the exchange, you may be able to sell Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd directly into local currency or first convert it into a widely used cryptocurrency like Bitcoin (BTC) or Tether (USDT) before cashing out.

After completing the sale, your balance will appear in fiat currency within your exchange account. From there, you can withdraw funds through available payment channels such as bank transfers, card withdrawals, or third-party payment providers. The specific options and processing times vary across platforms, so reviewing withdrawal fees, limits, and timelines beforehand is recommended.

Finally, keep in mind that most exchanges require account verification before enabling fiat withdrawals, especially for larger amounts. By ensuring your account details are up to date, you can help avoid delays when transferring funds from your exchange wallet to your personal bank account in United States.

Source link

Micron’s $250 Billion Semiconductor Plant: Trump Highlights Historic Investment in U.S. Manufacturing – News and Statistics

Jul 11, 2026

Liz Claman delivered a live report from Clay, New York, where Micron is developing a memory chip fabrication facility with a price tag of $250 billion.

On Friday, President Donald Trump promoted Micron Technology‘s intention to allocate $250 billion toward U.S. semiconductor production, which the firm claims will become the biggest chip manufacturing site ever built in the country.

The enterprise headquartered in Boise, Idaho, revealed on Thursday that it is speeding up its domestic manufacturing and research expenditures, targeting 40% of its DRAM memory chip output to occur within the United States.

Trump posted on Truth Social that the move exemplifies what he called the Trump Effect, asserting that his administration is cutting regulations and reviving American industry after years of obstruction by prior Democratic leadership.

Micron anticipates spending over $250 billion by 2035, fueled by rising need for memory chips amid the artificial intelligence boom. The company noted that erecting the New York plant will demand thousands of skilled laborers, offering roles for union members, apprentices, graduates of local training initiatives, specialized contractors, and suppliers.

The project achieved its initial concrete placement at the Clay, New York, location on Thursday. Micron described it as the most substantial private investment in New York state history, projected to generate 50,000 jobs across the state, including 9,000 positions directly with Micron.

Micron further stated that its semiconductor operations in Idaho and Virginia, together with the New York endeavor, are anticipated to sustain an extra 90,000 jobs while bolstering U.S. economic and national security interests.

Trump also pointed to remarks from Micron President and CEO Sanjay Mehrotra, who indicated the company is raising its planned U.S. manufacturing and research outlay from $200 billion to $250 billion. Mehrotra explained that due to Trump’s leadership and policies, Micron is progressing ahead of schedule and expanding its investment, resulting in 100,000 American jobs. He characterized this as further proof of the Trump Effect driving unprecedented private-sector investment, domestic manufacturing, and employment growth.

Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick applauded the announcement, stating that the Trump economic approach demonstrates there has never been a more favorable moment to invest in the United States. Kelly Loeffler, head of the U.S. Small Business Administration, remarked that the $250 billion commitment represents precisely the kind of daring, American-made pledge that President Trump’s strategy was intended to unleash.

Interactive table based on the Store Companies dataset for this report.

Sort: Rank
Sort: Company A-Z
Sort: Headquarters A-Z

#
Company
Headquarters
Focus
Scale
Note

1
Micron Technology
Boise, Idaho
DRAM, NAND Flash
Global leader
Major memory IC producer

2
Intel Corporation
Santa Clara, California
3D XPoint, Optane memory
Global giant
Developed advanced memory solutions

3
Western Digital
San Jose, California
NAND Flash, SSDs
Global leader
Flash memory via SanDisk

4
Seagate Technology
Fremont, California
Storage, HDD/SSD controllers
Global leader
Memory systems and controllers

5
Microchip Technology
Chandler, Arizona
Serial memory, EEPROM
Major supplier
Broad memory portfolio

6
SkyWater Technology
Bloomington, Minnesota
Foundry, memory IP
US-based foundry
Produces memory circuits

7
Rambus
San Jose, California
Memory interface IP, chips
IP and chip provider
High-speed memory interfaces

8
Lattice Semiconductor
Hillsboro, Oregon
FPGA, embedded memory
Mid-size
Devices include on-chip memory

9
Monolithic Power Systems (MPS)
San Jose, California
Power management, memory power
Major analog
ICs for memory modules

10
Marvell Technology
Santa Clara, California
Storage controllers, memory interconnect
Global fabless
SSD and memory controller chips

11
Analog Devices (ADI)
Wilmington, Massachusetts
Analog, memory interface ICs
Global giant
ICs for memory systems

12
Texas Instruments
Dallas, Texas
Embedded memory in MCUs/SoCs
Global giant
Memory integrated in devices

13
ON Semiconductor
Phoenix, Arizona
Power management for memory
Global supplier
Supporting memory ICs

14
MaxLinear
Carlsbad, California
RF, analog, memory interface
Fabless supplier
ICs for data storage

15
Integrated Silicon Solution Inc. (ISSI)
San Jose, California
SRAM, DRAM, Flash
Acquired by Chinese firm
US HQ, now subsidiary

16
Cypress Semiconductor (Infineon)
San Jose, California
SRAM, Flash, FRAM
Acquired
Was major US memory vendor

17
Macronix America
San Jose, California
NOR Flash memory
Subsidiary
US arm of Taiwan company

18
Integrated Device Technology (IDT)
San Jose, California
Memory interface, RISC-V
Acquired by Renesas
Was US-based

19
Silicon Motion Technology
San Jose, California
NAND flash controllers
Fabless, US HQ
Taiwanese-founded, US HQ

20
Netlist
Irvine, California
Hybrid memory modules, IP
Design and IP
Memory subsystem technology

21
Vishay Intertechnology
Malvern, Pennsylvania
Discrete, memory modules
Global manufacturer
Produces memory modules

22
SMART Modular Technologies
Newark, California
Memory modules, SSDs
Module manufacturer
Designs memory products

23
Adesto Technologies (Dialog)
Santa Clara, California
Low-power memory, CBRAM
Acquired
Was innovative memory vendor

24
Everspin Technologies
Chandler, Arizona
MRAM, persistent memory
Specialist
Leading MRAM producer

25
Aehr Test Systems
Fremont, California
Test systems for memory ICs
Equipment supplier
Critical for memory production

26
Rogue Valley Microdevices
Medford, Oregon
Foundry, memory prototyping
Small foundry
US-based memory IC maker

27
Nantero
Woburn, Massachusetts
NRAM, carbon nanotube memory
Startup
Developing novel memory ICs

28
Crossbar
Santa Clara, California
ReRAM, resistive RAM
Startup
Developing advanced memory ICs

29
Mythic
Austin, Texas
AI, analog in-memory compute
Startup
Memory-based AI chips

30
Weebit Nano
San Jose, California
ReRAM, embedded memory
Startup
US HQ for Israel-based tech

This report provides a comprehensive view of the memories industry in the United States, tracking demand, supply, and trade flows across the national value chain. It explains how demand across key channels and end-use segments shapes consumption patterns, while also mapping the role of input availability, production efficiency, and regulatory standards on supply.

Beyond headline metrics, the study benchmarks prices, margins, and trade routes so you can see where value is created and how it moves between domestic suppliers and international partners. The analysis is designed to support strategic planning, market entry, portfolio prioritization, and risk management in the memories landscape in the United States.

Quick navigation

Key findings

• Domestic demand is shaped by both household and industrial usage, with trade flows linking local supply to imports and exports.
• Pricing dynamics reflect unit values, freight costs, exchange rates, and regulatory shifts that affect sourcing decisions.
• Supply depends on input availability and production efficiency, creating a distinct national cost curve.
• Market concentration varies by segment, creating different competitive landscapes and entry barriers.
• The 2035 outlook highlights where capacity investment and demand growth are most aligned within the country.

Report scope

The report combines market sizing with trade intelligence and price analytics for the United States. It covers both historical performance and the forward outlook to 2035, allowing you to compare cycles, structural shifts, and policy impacts.

• Market size and growth in value and volume terms
• Consumption structure by end-use segments
• Production capacity, output, and cost dynamics
• Trade flows, exporters, importers, and balances
• Price benchmarks, unit values, and margin signals
• Competitive context and market entry conditions

Product coverage

• Prodcom 26113023 – Multichip integrated circuits: memories
• Prodcom 26113027 – Electronic integrated circuits (excluding multichip circuits): dynamic random-access memories (D-RAMs)
• Prodcom 26113034 – Electronic integrated circuits (excluding multichip circuits): static random-access memories (S-RAMs), including cache random-access memories (cache-RAMs)
• Prodcom 26113054 – Electronic integrated circuits (excluding multichip circuits): UV erasable, programmable, read only memories (EPROMs)
• Prodcom 26113065 – Electronic integrated circuits (excluding multichip circuits): electrically erasable, programmable, read only memories (E.PROMs), including flash E.PROMs
• Prodcom 26113067 – Electronic integrated circuits (excluding multichip circuits): other memories

Country coverage

Country profile and benchmarks

This report provides a consistent view of market size, trade balance, prices, and per-capita indicators for the United States. The profile highlights demand structure and trade position, enabling benchmarking against regional and global peers.

Methodology

The analysis is built on a multi-source framework that combines official statistics, trade records, company disclosures, and expert validation. Data are standardized, reconciled, and cross-checked to ensure consistency across time series.

• International trade data (exports, imports, and mirror statistics)
• National production and consumption statistics
• Company-level information from financial filings and public releases
• Price series and unit value benchmarks
• Analyst review, outlier checks, and time-series validation

All data are normalized to a common product definition and mapped to a consistent set of codes. This ensures that comparisons across time are aligned and actionable.

Forecasts to 2035

The forecast horizon extends to 2035 and is based on a structured model that links memories demand and supply to macroeconomic indicators, trade patterns, and sector-specific drivers. The model captures both cyclical and structural factors and reflects known policy and technology shifts in the United States.

• Historical baseline: 2012-2025
• Forecast horizon: 2026-2035
• Scenario-based sensitivity to income growth, substitution, and regulation
• Capacity and investment outlook for major producing companies

Each projection is built from national historical patterns and the broader regional context, allowing the report to show where growth is concentrated and where risks are elevated.

Price analysis and trade dynamics

Prices are analyzed in detail, including export and import unit values, regional spreads, and changes in trade costs. The report highlights how seasonality, freight rates, exchange rates, and supply disruptions influence pricing and margins.

• Price benchmarks by country and sub-region
• Export and import unit value trends
• Seasonality and calendar effects in trade flows
• Price outlook to 2035 under baseline assumptions

Profiles of market participants

Key producers, exporters, and distributors are profiled with a focus on their operational scale, geographic footprint, product mix, and market positioning. This helps identify competitive pressure points, partnership opportunities, and routes to differentiation.

• Business focus and production capabilities
• Geographic reach and distribution networks
• Cost structure and pricing strategy indicators
• Compliance, certification, and sustainability context

How to use this report

• Quantify domestic demand and identify the most attractive segments
• Evaluate export opportunities and prioritize target destinations
• Track price dynamics and protect margins
• Benchmark performance against leading competitors
• Build evidence-based forecasts for investment decisions

This report is designed for manufacturers, distributors, importers, wholesalers, investors, and advisors who need a clear, data-driven picture of memories dynamics in the United States.

FAQ

What is included in the memories market in the United States?

The market size aggregates consumption and trade data, presented in both value and volume terms.

How are the forecasts to 2035 built?

The projections combine historical trends with macroeconomic indicators, trade dynamics, and sector-specific drivers.

Does the report cover prices and margins?

Yes, it includes export and import unit values, regional spreads, and a pricing outlook to 2035.

Which benchmarks are included?

The report benchmarks market size, trade balance, prices, and per-capita indicators for the United States.

Can this report support market entry decisions?

Yes, it highlights demand hotspots, trade routes, pricing trends, and competitive context.

1. 1. INTRODUCTION

   Report Scope and Analytical Framing

   1. Report Description
   2. Research Methodology and the Analytical Framework
   3. Data-Driven Decisions for Your Business
   4. Glossary and Product-Specific Terms

2. 2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

   Concise View of Market Direction

   1. Key Findings
   2. Market Trends
   3. Strategic Implications
   4. Key Risks and Watchpoints

3. 3. DOMESTIC MARKET SIZE AND DEVELOPMENT PATH

   Market Size, Growth and Scenario Framing

   1. Market Size: Historical Data (2012-2025) and Forecast (2026-2035)
   2. Growth Outlook and Market Development Path to 2035
   3. Growth Driver Decomposition
   4. Scenario Framework and Sensitivities

4. 4. CATEGORY SCOPE, DEFINITIONS AND BOUNDARIES

   Commercial and Technical Scope

   1. What Is Included and How the Market Is Defined
   2. Market Inclusion Criteria
   3. Product / Category Definition
   4. Exclusions and Boundaries
   5. Distinction From Adjacent Products and Substitute Categories

5. 5. CATEGORY STRUCTURE, SEGMENTATION AND PRODUCT MATRIX

   How the Market Splits Into Decision-Relevant Buckets

   1. By Product Type / Configuration
   2. By Application / End Use
   3. By Customer / Buyer Type
   4. By Channel / Business Model / Technology Platform
   5. Segment Attractiveness Matrix
   6. Product Matrix and Segment Growth Logic

6. 6. DOMESTIC DEMAND, CUSTOMER AND BUYER ARCHITECTURE

   Where Demand Comes From and How It Behaves

   1. Consumption / Demand: Historical Data (2012-2025) and Forecast (2026-2035)
   2. Demand by End-Use and Buyer Group
   3. Demand by Customer / Consumer Segment
   4. Purchase Criteria, Switching Logic and Adoption Barriers
   5. Replacement, Replenishment and Installed-Base Dynamics
   6. Future Demand Outlook

7. 7. DOMESTIC PRODUCTION, SUPPLY AND VALUE CHAIN

   Supply Footprint and Value Capture

   1. Production in the Country
   2. Domestic Manufacturing Footprint
   3. Capacity, Bottlenecks and Supply Risks
   4. Value Chain Logic and Margin Pools
   5. Distribution and Route-to-Market Structure

8. 8. IMPORTS, EXPORTS AND SOURCING STRUCTURE

   Trade Flows and External Dependence

   1. Exports
   2. Imports
   3. Trade Balance
   4. Import Dependence
   5. Sourcing Risks and Resilience

9. 9. PRICING, PROMOTION AND COMMERCIAL MODEL

   Price Formation and Revenue Logic

   1. Domestic Price Levels and Corridors
   2. Pricing by Segment / Specification / Channel
   3. Cost Drivers and Margin Logic
   4. Promotion, Discounting and Procurement Patterns
   5. Revenue Quality and Commercial Levers

10. 10. COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE AND PORTFOLIO POWER

    Who Wins and Why

    1. Market Structure and Concentration
    2. Competitive Archetypes
    3. Segment-by-Segment Competitive Intensity
    4. Portfolio Breadth and Product Positioning
    5. Capability Matrix
    6. Strategic Moves, Partnerships and Expansion Signals

11. 11. DOMESTIC MARKET STRUCTURE AND CHANNEL LOGIC

    How the Domestic Market Works

    1. Core Demand Centers
    2. Local Production and Distribution Roles
    3. Channel Structure
    4. Buyer and Procurement Architecture
    5. Regional Imbalances Within the Country

12. 12. GROWTH PLAYBOOK AND MARKET ENTRY

    Commercial Entry and Scaling Priorities

    1. Where to Play
    2. How to Win
    3. Distributor / Partner / Direct Entry Options
    4. Capability Thresholds
    5. Entry Risks and Mitigation

13. 13. WHERE TO PLAY NEXT: MOST ATTRACTIVE GROWTH OPPORTUNITIES

    Where the Best Expansion Logic Sits

    1. Most Attractive Product Niches
    2. Most Attractive Customer Segments
    3. White Spaces and Unsaturated Opportunities
    4. High-Margin and Underpenetrated Pockets
    5. Most Promising Product Adjacencies

14. 14. PROFILES OF MAJOR COMPANIES

    Leading Players and Strategic Archetypes

    1. Leading Manufacturers and Suppliers
    2. Production Footprint and Capacities
    3. Product Portfolio and Segment Focus
    4. Pricing Positioning and Indicative Price Logic
    5. Channel / Distribution Strength
    6. Strategic Archetypes

15. 15. METHODOLOGY, SOURCES AND DISCLAIMER

    How the Report Was Built

    1. Modeling Logic
    2. Source Register
    3. Publications, Regulatory and Industry References
    4. Analytical Notes
    5. Disclaimer

Loading News content from Store report…

Micron Technology

Major memory IC producer

Intel Corporation

Developed advanced memory solutions

Western Digital

Flash memory via SanDisk

Seagate Technology

Memory systems and controllers

Microchip Technology

Broad memory portfolio

SkyWater Technology

Produces memory circuits

Rambus

High-speed memory interfaces

Lattice Semiconductor

Devices include on-chip memory

Monolithic Power Systems (MPS)

ICs for memory modules

Marvell Technology

SSD and memory controller chips

Analog Devices (ADI)

ICs for memory systems

Texas Instruments

Memory integrated in devices

ON Semiconductor

Supporting memory ICs

MaxLinear

ICs for data storage

Integrated Silicon Solution Inc. (ISSI)

US HQ, now subsidiary

Cypress Semiconductor (Infineon)

Was major US memory vendor

Macronix America

US arm of Taiwan company

Integrated Device Technology (IDT)

Was US-based

Silicon Motion Technology

Taiwanese-founded, US HQ

Netlist

Memory subsystem technology

Vishay Intertechnology

Produces memory modules

SMART Modular Technologies

Designs memory products

Adesto Technologies (Dialog)

Was innovative memory vendor

Everspin Technologies

Leading MRAM producer

Aehr Test Systems

Critical for memory production

Rogue Valley Microdevices

US-based memory IC maker

Nantero

Developing novel memory ICs

Crossbar

Developing advanced memory ICs

Mythic

Memory-based AI chips

Weebit Nano

US HQ for Israel-based tech

Loading Reviews content from Store report…

Loading Dashboard content from Store report…

Loading Macro Indicators content from Store report…

Source link

Press Release: DelBene, Buchanan, and Sewell Introduce Semiconductor Superiority Act to Enhance U.S. Manufacturing and Global Competitiveness

Suzan DelBene introduces the Semiconductor Superiority Act to support U.S. semiconductor manufacturing in space.

Quiver AI Summary

Legislative Proposal Introduced: Representatives Suzan DelBene, Vern Buchanan, and Terri Sewell have introduced the Semiconductor Superiority Act. This bill aims to amend the Section 48D Advanced Manufacturing Investment Credit to explicitly include space-based semiconductor manufacturing, with the goal of enhancing U.S. leadership in the technology sector.

Impact of Space Manufacturing: The legislation seeks to clarify that technologies developed in low-Earth orbit qualify for existing tax incentives aimed at U.S. semiconductor production. Proponents argue that microgravity benefits fabrication processes, enabling advancements critical for emerging technologies like quantum computing and AI, as highlighted by DelBene.

Support from Key Representatives: Buchanan emphasized the importance of keeping U.S. companies competitive in the space economy, while Sewell noted the bill’s potential to strengthen national security and high-paying job creation. The bill is seen as a strategic response to global competition, particularly with China’s advancements in semiconductor technologies.

Disclaimer: This is an AI-generated summary of a press release. The model used to summarize this release may make mistakes. See the full release here.

Check out the Quiver Quantitative API to build on top of data on congressional stock trading, insider transactions, hedge fund moves, and more.

🏛️ Receive Alerts on Congress

Sign Up

Suzan K. DelBene Fundraising

Suzan K. DelBene recently disclosed $562.3K of fundraising in a Q1 FEC disclosure filed on April 15th, 2026. This was the 190th most from all Q1 reports we have seen this year. 51.2% came from individual donors.

DelBene disclosed $655.5K of spending. This was the 125th most from all Q1 reports we have seen from politicians so far this year.

DelBene disclosed $1.4M of cash on hand at the end of the filing period. This was the 325th most from all Q1 reports we have seen this year.

You can see the disclosure here, or track Suzan K. DelBene’s fundraising on Quiver Quantitative.

Suzan K. DelBene Net Worth

Quiver Quantitative estimates that Suzan K. DelBene is worth $142.9M, as of May 22nd, 2026. This is the 13th highest net worth in Congress, per our live estimates.

DelBene has approximately $18.8M invested in publicly traded assets which Quiver is able to track live.

You can track Suzan K. DelBene’s net worth on Quiver Quantitative’s politician page for DelBene.

Suzan K. DelBene Bill Proposals

Here are some bills which have recently been proposed by Suzan K. DelBene:

• H.R.8261: Chronic Care Management Improvement Act of 2026
• H.R.7868: Expanding Support for Living Donors Act of 2026
• H.R.6787: Clean Competition Act
• H.R.5940: Seniors Deserve SMARTER Care Act of 2025
• H.R.4649: Smart Cities and Communities Act of 2025
• H.R.2421: Protecting Taxpayer Resources Act

You can track bills proposed by Suzan K. DelBene on Quiver Quantitative’s politician page for DelBene.

2026 Washington’s 1st Congressional District Election

There has been approximately $4,533,458 of spending in Washington’s 1st congressional district elections over the last two years, per our estimates.

The rating for this race is currently “Solid D”.

You can track this election on our matchup page for the 2026 Washington’s 1st congressional district election.

Source link

Taiwan to invest $250B in US semiconductor manufacturing under new deal

Stock image. Image credit: IM Imagery/stock.adobe.com

The American Institute in Taiwan and the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office have signed a trade agreement that will build new semiconductor factories in the United States.

The deal involves Taiwanese tech companies investing at least USD 250 billion (AUD 374 billion) in production facilities in the United States in exchange for a restructured U.S. tariff framework on Taiwanese industrial and pharmaceutical goods.

Under this agreement, tariff rates for Taiwanese goods are now capped at a maximum of 15% – down from 20%. These apply to Taiwanese exports, such as auto parts, timber, lumber and wood derivative products. A 0% “reciprocal tariff” will be applied to generic pharmaceuticals and their ingredients, aircraft components and some natural sources.

“The United States and Taiwan will establish world-class industrial parks in the United States to strengthen America’s industrial infrastructure and position the United States as the global centre for next-generation technology, advanced manufacturing, and innovation,” the U.S. Department of Commerce said in a statement last week.

Beyond tariff adjustments, the deal includes measures to increase market access and investment between the two regions.

Taiwan will facilitate expanded U.S. investment within its own domestic industries, specifically focusing on defence technology, telecommunications, biotechnology, semiconductors, and artificial intelligence. This is intended to deepen technological collaboration and strengthen the U.S. position in these critical emerging sectors.

The trade deal also includes specific “reward” mechanisms for Taiwanese semiconductor companies that localise production in the United States. Companies building new U.S. capacity can import up to 2.5 times their planned capacity duty-free. Once a Taiwanese company finishes building its new factory in the United States, the U.S. government will allow that company to bring in extra chips from its overseas plants without charging them the standard “security” tax, according to the Commerce Department’s statement. 

Source link

Taiwan to invest $250 billion in US semiconductor manufacturing

The Trump administration signed a deal worth $250 billion with Taiwan, in a move designed to help the United States boost domestic semiconductor manufacturing. This deal was announced by the U.S. Department of Commerce on Thursday.

Under this deal, Taiwanese semiconductor and tech companies have agreed to make direct investments into the U.S. semiconductor industry. According to a press release, these investments will span across semiconductors, energy, and AI “production and innovation”. Currently, Taiwan produces more than half of the world’s semiconductors.

Taiwan will also supply an additional $250 billion in credit guarantees for additional investments from these semiconductors and tech enterprises, according to the commerce department. The timeline for the investments is unclear.

READ: Biden administration to intensify restrictions on China’s access to AI chips (January 14, 2025)

In return for the investment, the U.S. will invest in Taiwan’s semiconductor, defense, AI, telecommunications, and biotech industries. The amount for this investment was not specified.

This news comes the day after the Trump administration published a proclamation reiterating the country’s goal to bring more semiconductor manufacturing back to the United States.

“This dependence on foreign supply chains is a significant economic and national security risk,” the proclamation stated. “Given the foundational role that semiconductors play in the modern economy and national defense, a disruption of import-reliant supply chains could strain the United States’ industrial and military capabilities.”

The proclamation also announced 25% of tariffs on some advanced AI chips. It also stated that once trade talks with other countries–like this deal with Taiwan–are complete, there would be additional semiconductor tariffs.

In 2025, Trump has made semiconductor manufacturing a central focus of his economic agenda, aiming to reduce U.S. reliance on foreign chip production and bring manufacturing back to American soil.

His administration has proposed aggressive trade measures, including a potential 100% tariff on imported semiconductors. However, companies that commit to building manufacturing capacity in the U.S. could be exempt according to previous reports.

In March last year, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (TSMC) announced plans to invest $100 billion into bolstering chip manufacturing in the U.S.

READ: The perils of Trump’s proposed tariff trade war (February 6, 2025

Semiconductors are the foundational components of modern technology. They power computing systems in products ranging from smartphones and automobiles to telecommunications equipment and military weapons.

According to a press release from the U.S. Department of Commerce, the U.S. share of global wafer fabrication declined sharply from 37 percent in 1990 to less than 10 percent in 2024. Today, most semiconductors are fabricated in East Asia due to foreign industrial policies.

Source link

EB-2 NIW and Semiconductor Manufacturing Priority

For professionals pursuing the EB-2 National Interest Waiver (NIW), semiconductor manufacturing now sits squarely within one of the clearest national priority areas recognized by the U.S. government.

For decades, advanced technology was discussed primarily in economic terms. Innovation drove growth. Growth created jobs. That framework worked when technology remained largely commercial. 

Semiconductors no longer fit that model. 

Today, semiconductor chips underpin systems central to U.S. national security and economic stability, including artificial intelligence (AI), defense technologies, cybersecurity, telecommunications, healthcare, and transportation. When a single technology supports so many critical functions, it becomes a strategic asset rather than an industry trend. For EB-2 NIW petitioners, this distinction matters, because USCIS evaluates national importance through the lens of federal priorities that extend beyond private-sector demand. 

At the same time, advanced semiconductor manufacturing remains heavily concentrated outside the United States, particularly in East Asia. Recent shortages exposed how vulnerable global supply chains can be and highlighted the risks of relying on foreign production for technology the U.S. cannot afford to lose control over. 

As a result, semiconductor manufacturing has moved to the center of national policy. 

The U.S. Push to Rebuild Domestic Chip Manufacturing 

The federal government now treats semiconductor production as critical infrastructure. America’s AI Action Plan from July 2025 is direct on this point: “Now America must bring semiconductor manufacturing back to U.S. soil.” For professionals already working in semiconductor-related fields, this policy articulation helps clarify how their work aligns with national objectives the government has formally identified. 

This push is tied to the broader infrastructure required to sustain AI leadership: “AI will require new infrastructure, factories to produce chips, data centers to run those chips, and new sources of energy to power it all.” 

AI requires massive computing power, which depends on advanced semiconductors. When production occurs abroad, the United States has less control over availability, security standards, and long-term scalability. From a national strategy perspective, that dependence creates real risk. Professionals contributing to domestic production, process improvement, or supply-chain resilience are therefore operating within an area the government already views as strategically sensitive. 

In response, federal policy has focused on accelerating domestic manufacturing by reducing barriers that slow development. This includes streamlining the permitting of fabrication facilities, modernizing regulatory processes, and coordinating land use, energy infrastructure, and security requirements. 

The goal is not incremental growth. It is rebuilding a domestic manufacturing ecosystem capable of supporting advanced technologies at scale. 

Why This Policy Shift Matters for Immigration 

Rebuilding semiconductor manufacturing is not only an infrastructure challenge. It is a workforce challenge. 

Advanced fabrication plants, data centers, and supporting systems require highly specialized expertise to design, operate, and optimize. These skills take years to develop and exist within a limited global talent pool. Domestic training pipelines alone are unlikely to meet near-term demand. 

For that reason, immigration policy has become a functional part of the semiconductor strategy rather than a separate consideration. Professionals with relevant semiconductor expertise are increasingly well positioned to frame their work within existing national priorities when pursuing self-sponsored immigration options, rather than relying solely on employer-driven pathways. 

How EB-2 NIW Fits Today’s Semiconductor Priorities 

The EB-2 NIW aligns closely with how the United States is currently prioritizing semiconductor manufacturing. 

It allows qualified professionals to pursue permanent residence without a job offer when their work advances U.S. interests at a broader level. Rather than focusing on a single employer’s needs, USCIS looks at whether the individual’s contributions support national priorities the government has already identified. This framework allows semiconductor professionals to rely on documented federal policy goals, rather than speculative future needs, when presenting their case. 

Semiconductor manufacturing meets the national importance standard with unusual clarity. As America’s AI Action Plan states: “A revitalized U.S. chip industry will generate thousands of high-paying jobs… and protect our supply chains from disruption by foreign rivals.” 

Federal policy has tied domestic chip production to national security, economic resilience, and technological leadership. For that reason, EB-2 NIW petitions connected to critical and emerging technologies, including semiconductors, can be particularly strong when they are well framed and well supported. 

Other immigration options may also apply, including the EB-1A and the O-1. These categories can be a strong fit for professionals who can document extraordinary ability and top-of-field recognition, but they typically require a higher evidentiary showing. For many semiconductor professionals doing important work without that level of public distinction, the EB-2 NIW is often the more practical pathway because it focuses on national importance and the ability to advance the proposed endeavor. 

EB-2 NIW Is Not Limited to High-Profile Professionals 

A common misconception is that EB-2 NIW approval requires patents, public recognition, or executive-level titles. While this can be helpful evidence, they are not required. 

USCIS evaluates whether a professional is well positioned to advance a nationally important endeavor considering several factors. Semiconductor manufacturing is a complex ecosystem, and meaningful contributions occur across many roles. 

Professionals working in semiconductor manufacturing and process engineering, chip design and microelectronics, materials science and nanotechnology, automation and robotics, AI applied to manufacturing, yield optimization, energy efficiency, and semiconductor supply chains may all be well positioned for EB-2 NIW approval. 

Each case is evaluated individually. What matters is how a professional’s specific background supports domestic semiconductor production and related national priorities. 

What Strengthens a Semiconductor-Focused EB-2 NIW Petition

A strong EB-2 NIW petition does more than identify an important field. It explains how the individual’s work advances that field in a concrete way. In semiconductor cases, this often includes a record of related professional experience, research or technical projects, manufacturing or process improvements, internal innovations, or recognition by employers, industry partners, or professional organizations. Funding or research experience can also strengthen the record, though it is not required. 

Equally important is a clear proposed endeavor. USCIS looks for a specific, forward-looking explanation of what the professional plans to do in the United States and how that work supports national priorities tied to semiconductor manufacturing. General statements about working “in semiconductors” are rarely sufficient. Specificity strengthens credibility. 

When a clear record of success is paired with a well-defined plan, the national interest argument becomes easier to articulate and evaluate. 

A National Priority That Strengthens the EB-2 NIW Framework

The effort to restore semiconductor manufacturing in the United States reflects a long-term national strategy. Domestic chip production now sits at the intersection of national security, economic resilience, and technological leadership. 

As the federal government works to rebuild manufacturing capacity and secure critical supply chains, demand for highly skilled professionals will continue to grow. For individuals already contributing to semiconductor manufacturing and related technologies, this policy environment provides a clear framework for positioning their work within the EB-2 NIW analysis. 

When a professional’s work supports objectives the United States has already defined as critical, the path to demonstrating national interest is clearer and more firmly grounded in national policy. 

Understanding how your background fits into this landscape is the first step.

Source link