Inflation’s Next Wave? A Critical U.S. Manufacturing Gauge Just Surged 10% Higher


Factory purchasing managers just sent a signal that the last stretch of falling inflation may be coming to an end, and the reason behind it traces straight back to what consumers are doing with their wallets.

This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.

Factory purchasing managers paid sharply more for materials in September. The Institute for Supply Management (ISM) reported that its Manufacturing Prices Paid Index rose from 71.1 to 77.9, a one-month gain of about 9.6% and the highest reading since May. A reading above 50 signals rising prices; near 78 indicates broad, accelerating increases.

It was also the index’s largest monthly increase since February. Since the start of the year, the index has gained 19.4 points, its third-biggest nine-month increase since 2021. That year is the right comparison. In 2021, factory input costs rose this quickly and reached store shelves within months.

Why Demand Is Driving Prices Higher Now

What stands out in September is the reason for the increase. Factories are busy. The ISM’s headline Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI) came in at 54.5, its ninth consecutive month of expansion and its longest streak since 2022. New orders rose to 55.3. The backlog of unfilled orders jumped 4.6 points to 56.4, its second-highest level since May 2022.

Mark Vitner, chief economist at Piedmont Crescent Capital, named his review “The Order Book Reopened as Prices Snapped Back.” When orders arrive faster than plants can fill them, suppliers gain pricing power and manufacturers have less room to absorb increases.

Consumers are creating that demand. Retail sales hit a record $737.8 billion in August. That was 1.1% more than in July and 5.4% more than a year earlier. When shoppers keep spending at that pace, companies can pass along higher costs. Imports are rising quickly as well. In July, the trade deficit widened by $17.4 billion to $88.6 billion, which is outside its typical range of -$60B to -$80B.

What Higher Factory Costs Mean for Your Household Budget

Inflation was already running above target before this new pressure showed up. The Consumer Price Index (CPI) rose 3.4% from a year earlier in August, including a 0.4% increase in that month alone. Core Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) inflation, the Federal Reserve’s preferred measure, was 3.0%, compared with the central bank’s 2% target.

Higher producer costs typically reach consumers within months, first in goods made from metals, plastics, chemicals and packaging: appliances, auto parts, home improvement supplies and packaged food. Households should expect goods prices to rise through the holiday season and into early 2027.

The Fed is looking at the same data. Reuters reported that August inflation rose below expectations, giving the Fed breathing space. Bloomberg reported that Scott Bessent urged the Fed to keep an “open mind” on the inflation outlook. The September factory survey suggests that breathing space may not last. The CPI figures that pleased policymakers measure prices that were set before this jump in input costs.

Three Signals to Watch Before Year-End

Three readings will show whether September was a one-time jump or the start of a lasting rise in prices. The first is the ISM’s October report, due in early November. A second straight prices reading in the high 70s would confirm the pressure is staying. The second is the backlog index. If factories add capacity and work through their orders, their pricing power fades.

If backlogs keep growing, it strengthens. The third is goods prices in the next two CPI reports. If goods inflation speeds up while core PCE stays at 3.0%, the Fed loses the room August gave it. Borrowers hoping for lower rates would then face a longer wait.

Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.

Free Training

Source link

the impact of higher prices for imported inputs in the United States



donald trump estados unidos_2026 (5)CORTESÍA: THE WHITE HOUSE

96% of the cost of the tariffs imposed in 2025 by President Donald Trump was absorbed by U.S. buyers, not by exporting countries such as China. This is revealed in the report “America’s Own Goal: Who Pays the Tariffs?”, prepared by the Kiel Institute (January 2026). While the political narrative of Donald Trump argues that tariffs would be paid by trading partners, the evidence shows that the burden has fallen on importers, manufacturers, and consumers within the United States itself. For U.S. manufacturing, this means direct pressure on costs, margins, and competitiveness.

READ ALSO. When Can I Watch Scream 7 on Paramount+? It will be available for streaming this month in 2026

How Do Tariffs Affect Manufacturing in the United States?

Modern manufacturing depends on global supply chains. Even products assembled in the United States incorporate parts, components, or raw materials from China, India, Brazil, and other markets.

The Kiel Institute study, based on more than 25 million shipments worth nearly $4 trillion, shows that when tariffs increase, import prices rise almost proportionally. In other words, foreign exporters barely reduce their prices, so the additional cost is passed on to the U.S. buyer.

For manufacturers, this translates into:

  • ⇒ Higher costs for intermediate inputs.
  • ⇒ Increased total production costs.
  • ⇒ Pressure to raise final prices or reduce margins.

Does China Pay the Tariffs, or Does the Cost Stay in the United States?

One of the report’s most relevant findings is that China did not absorb the financial impact of the tariffs, even when rates at times exceeded 100%. Instead of lowering prices, exporters maintained their price levels and reduced shipment volumes.

The estimated coefficient in the study indicates that only about 4% of the tariff was absorbed by exporters, while 96% was passed on to U.S. importers. This undermines the narrative that tariffs represent a direct transfer of wealth from China to the United States.

In practice, it means that U.S. manufacturing pays more for the same inputs.

Why Don’t Exporters Lower Their Prices in Response to Tariffs?

The document identifies several structural reasons:

  1. ⇒ Alternative markets: Chinese or Indian exporters can redirect production to Europe or other regions.
  2. ⇒ Magnitude of the tariff: 25% or 50% tariffs are difficult to offset through discounts without severely affecting margins.
  3. ⇒ Supply chain rigidity: Many U.S. manufacturers cannot immediately replace suppliers.

As a result, the adjustment occurs in quantities (less trade), not in prices.

What Impact Do Tariffs Have on Production Costs?

For U.S. manufacturing, rising prices of imported inputs create a domino effect:

  • Higher unit costs.
  • Need to pass increases on to distributors or consumers.
  • Reduced competitiveness compared to foreign producers that do not face the same input cost increases.

Moreover, the report highlights that in 2025, U.S. customs revenue increased by approximately $200 billion — a figure that, rather than coming from China, was paid by American companies and consumers.

This phenomenon effectively turns tariffs into an indirect tax on domestic production and consumption.

What Happens to Investment and Industrial Competitiveness?

Higher input costs directly affect manufacturers’ financial planning. Faced with rising expenses, companies may:

  • ⇒ Reduce investment in expansion or innovation.
  • ⇒ Adjust employment or production levels.
  • ⇒ Reconfigure supply chains at high transition costs.

Although the political intent behind tariffs has been to strengthen domestic industry, the study suggests the effect may be the opposite: greater pressure on local manufacturers that depend on international trade.

Is This a Repeat of Donald Trump’s Trade War Scenario?

The Policy Brief notes that the outcomes observed in 2025 replicate what happened during the 2018–2019 trade war under President Donald Trump: tariffs raise domestic prices, reduce trade volumes, and create economic distortions, with no evidence that foreign exporters assume a significant share of the cost.

The difference is that in 2025 the scope was broader, amplifying the impact on sectors such as manufacturing.

Who Ultimately Bears the Cost of Tariffs?

The process unfolds step by step:

  1. ⇒ The importer pays the tariff at the border.
  2. ⇒ The manufacturer faces more expensive inputs.
  3. ⇒ The distributor adjusts prices.
  4. ⇒ The final consumer absorbs the increase.

According to the study, tariffs function in practice as a selective tax on consumption and production in the United States, with additional effects such as reduced product variety and market distortions.

Free Training

Source link