The Missing Layer in U.S. Manufacturing Readiness: Rahul Kumar Thatikonda’s Case for Overlay Interoperability

The Readiness Gap Behind Modern Manufacturing

American manufacturing has spent years improving visibility across supply chains, procurement networks, and production systems. But visibility alone does not guarantee readiness. In many continuity-sensitive environments, the harder problem begins after new information arrives. Supplier instability, material shortages, severe weather, government restrictions, and conflict-related sourcing disruptions can all affect whether production remains on track. Yet in many organizations, those signals still emerge outside the purchasing, inventory, planning, and operations systems that govern daily decisions.

That gap has become harder to ignore. Modern disruption moves faster than many industrial systems were built to handle. Even when companies can detect risk, they may still struggle to translate that information into a procurement adjustment, a supplier-readiness review, or a planning action that can be tracked, escalated, and governed inside existing workflows. In practice, the weakness is often not the absence of data. It is the absence of a practical layer that can turn new information into reviewable operational action.

For large manufacturers, that problem is not theoretical. Many still rely on older enterprise environments that remain deeply embedded in procurement, inventory control, planning, and fulfillment. Replacing those systems outright is often expensive, operationally risky, and slow. The more urgent question is whether the systems companies already depend on can be made more responsive to the kinds of disruption signals that increasingly shape continuity and readiness.

Why Visibility Alone Is Not Enough

The industrial conversation around resilience often emphasizes forecasting, dashboards, and visibility platforms. Those tools can help identify risk, but they do not solve the harder operational problem on their own. A signal is only useful if it reaches the workflow where action can actually be taken.

That is the missing layer in many manufacturing environments: not data collection, but operational translation. A weather event may threaten inbound logistics. A supplier delay may change material availability. A government restriction may affect sourcing or delivery. But unless that information can be connected to the systems that control purchasing, planning, and operations, the organization may still respond too late.

This is one reason legacy dependence remains a serious issue across large enterprises. In practice, many organizations cannot pause operations for a full modernization effort every time new categories of risk emerge. They need ways to work with the infrastructure they already have. That makes interoperability more than a technical convenience. It becomes part of how readiness is preserved under stress.

A Systems-Focused Background

Rahul Kumar Thatikonda is a digital transformation leader whose work focuses on industrial AI, enterprise interoperability, decision-support systems, orchestration frameworks, and supply-chain resilience in legacy-heavy operating environments. He earned a Master of Science in Business Analytics & Project Management from the University of Connecticut School of Business in 2018, and additional information about his technical work and publications is available through his public research profiles.

His technical record has centered on a recurring problem in large organizations: how to make new operationally important information usable inside older systems that were never designed to absorb it quickly. Public technical materials associated with his research include work on orchestration for ERP-connected environments, readiness protocols, resilient interoperability, and industrial risk modeling.

That focus matters because large manufacturers do not operate in abstract digital environments. They operate through embedded workflows, existing system constraints, and decision chains that often cannot be redesigned overnight. In that context, the most valuable technical work is not always the loudest or the most futuristic. It is often the work that makes real systems more usable under real conditions.

An Overlay Approach to Industrial Readiness

At the center of Thatikonda’s work is a reusable overlay interoperability framework intended to help manufacturing organizations use incoming disruption-related information without requiring full replacement of their core systems. The approach is designed to connect signals such as supplier delays, shortages, weather events, restrictions, logistics interruptions, and sourcing disruptions to existing workflows and convert them into reviewable, trackable actions. Those actions may include risk alerts, supplier-readiness prompts, procurement adjustments, and other controlled interventions that allow personnel to respond earlier and with greater clarity.

That distinction matters. Much of the discussion around industrial AI still falls into one of two categories: ambitious modernization programs that are difficult to implement at scale, or analytics layers that increase visibility without changing operational response. Thatikonda’s framework sits in a more practical middle ground. The point is not simply to generate more alerts or more predictions. It is to make incoming disruption information usable inside legacy purchasing, inventory, planning, and operational systems without forcing companies to abandon the systems they already use.

In that sense, the work is about more than software integration. It is about interoperability as a readiness discipline. The underlying premise is that organizations need a governed way to translate fragmented external signals into workflow actions that can be reviewed, tracked, and acted upon before disruption escalates into a larger continuity problem.

From Architecture to Early Validation

What gives this work more weight than a purely conceptual model is that it has already been formalized through technical documentation, public dissemination, and architecture-level development. Publicly available materials associated with Thatikonda’s work include technical reports and protocol documents on AI-enabled order-to-cash acceleration, readiness frameworks, orchestration for ERP-connected systems, and resilient interoperability design. 

Those materials suggest a pattern that matters in industrial systems work: the contribution is being documented in a way that allows outside readers to assess the architecture, not merely hear broad claims about it. In fields where many ideas remain internal to organizations, that level of technical explanation helps separate a defined framework from a general business concept.

The record also suggests that the framework has been shaped by experience in large enterprise settings where interoperability, workflow control, and cross-system orchestration matter. The most careful way to read that background is not as proof that every implementation question has already been solved, but as evidence that the framework has been informed by practical operating conditions rather than abstract software theory alone. That is an important distinction in manufacturing, where pilot results and architecture discipline often matter more than broad claims of disruption.

A further sign of seriousness is that the work has also been formalized through patent-related development covering orchestration, interoperability, and resilient deployment architecture.  This does not by itself establish adoption, nor should it be read that way. What it does suggest is that the contribution is being developed as a defined technical framework with enough coherence to support formalization, scrutiny, and continued refinement.

Why the United States Needs This Work

The significance of this kind of work lies less in broad claims about artificial intelligence and more in its relevance to continuity-sensitive industrial environments. In sectors where production readiness and supply continuity matter, earlier and more controlled operational response can make a meaningful difference. The challenge is not simply whether risk can be detected. It is whether organizations can absorb that information into the systems that still drive decisions.

That is part of what makes overlay interoperability an important idea at this moment. Many manufacturers in the United States are operating in a world where disruption signals are increasing, but infrastructure replacement cycles remain slow. Under those conditions, practical modernization may depend less on rebuilding everything from the ground up and more on making existing systems more capable of using the information modern disruption keeps generating.

This is where Thatikonda’s work has broader relevance, particularly in supporting the objectives of the Department of Defense’s National Defense Industrial Strategy (NDIS). It addresses a recurring problem faced by large companies across aerospace, defense-related, and other critical manufacturing settings… The United States needs more work in this category because industrial resilience does not depend only on high-level policy goals, domestic capacity, or supplier diversification mandates. It also depends on whether organizations can act on operationally relevant information in time to reduce downstream shortages, delays, and production instability. A practical framework that helps companies use that information inside the systems they already operate addresses a real implementation gap in American manufacturing readiness.

A More Practical Model of Resilience

Industrial resilience is often discussed in sweeping terms: digital transformation, predictive intelligence, next-generation manufacturing. Those themes matter, but they can obscure a more immediate operational truth. Many of the systems that still run large organizations were not built to absorb today’s disruption signals in real time, and many companies cannot afford to replace them overnight.

That reality is what makes a practical overlay model compelling. Instead of assuming that resilience must begin with total replacement, it starts from the conditions large organizations actually face: layered systems, embedded workflows, long modernization cycles, and the need for earlier, better-governed decisions under uncertainty.

Thatikonda’s work suggests that one of the most important advances in manufacturing readiness may not come from starting over, but from building disciplined ways to make existing systems more responsive under stress. If that approach continues to mature across critical manufacturing settings, it could help define a more realistic path for continuity, responsiveness, and industrial readiness in the United States.

For additional technical and publication records associated with Rahul Kumar Thatikonda, readers may refer to his ORCID profile: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1234-7915



Source link

Trump’s tariffs are causing harm to American manufacturers instead of benefiting them

WASHINGTON (AP) — Jay Allen is a fan of President Donald Trump, and voted for him on the belief that the Republican would cut taxes and trim regulations, helping his manufacturing business in northeast Arkansas.

READ MORE: Trump administration starts new process to try to replace tariffs struck down by Supreme Court

But the tariffs at the core of Trump’s economic agenda have wreaked havoc on his company, Allen Engineering Corp., which makes industrial equipment used to install, finish and pave concrete. The import taxes have raised the costs of engines, steel, gearboxes and clutches made abroad that Allen needs to build power trowels that can sell for up to $100,000 each.

Allen’s experience embodies a growing body of evidence that the tariffs that Trump said would help American factories are, in fact, squashing many of them. The problem could get worse as the administration scrambles to craft new tariffs to replace the emergency import taxes that the Supreme Court ruled illegal in February.

WATCH: Trump says tariffs could replace income tax

Allen said he ran his company at a loss in 2025 because of tariffs. His payroll has fallen to 140 workers from a peak of 205. To get by this year, he has hiked prices by 8% to 10%, even though that might mean fewer sales.

“What’s really sad is the unintended consequences of his tariffs are hurting manufacturing in our country,” said Allen. “Unfortunately, the working-class people are getting squeezed.”

Manufacturing jobs have declined during Trump’s first year back

Trump’s core rationale for tariffs has been that they would force more factories to open in the U.S. and would generate enough revenue to close federal budget deficits. But that hasn’t materialized.

Factories continue to shed workers, with 98,000 manufacturing jobs lost during Trump’s first full 12 months back in the White House. American companies that foot the bill for tariffs are now suing the Trump administration for more than $130 billion in tariff refunds. Meanwhile, the federal deficit is projected to climb over the next decade.

READ MORE: U.S. employers added just 73,000 jobs last month as labor market weakens in face of Trump trade wars

The White House maintains that construction spending is high, more workers are being hired to build factories, new investments are being made and labor productivity in manufacturing is increasing — which could eventually fuel a factory revival.

“It takes time to get production online, and therefore it will be some more time before we fully materialize the benefits of the president’s policies,” Pierre Yared, the acting chairman of the White House Council of Economic Advisers, said in an email.

Construction is up — but that’s due to Biden’s bill

Some of the bright spots in construction cited by the White House appear to be the result of programs launched by then-President Joe Biden, a Democrat.

Factory construction spending began to accelerate in 2022 with the anticipation of government support from Biden’s CHIPS and Science Act, which included big subsidies for computer chip plants. The law was a primary contributor to a historic surge in the annualized rate of construction spending on manufacturing facilities, said Skanda Amarnath, executive director of the economic policy group Employ America.

READ MORE: Trump’s tariffs could squeeze U.S. factories and raise costs by up to 4.5%, a new analysis finds

Construction spending on factories has slipped during Trump’s presidency, but the pace remains relatively high largely because of continuing work on Biden-era projects in Arizona, Texas and Idaho, Amarnath said.

Amarnath has also gone through the interviews regional Federal Reserve banks have held with businesses. Those comments show some companies might expand by taking advantage of Trump’s tax breaks on investments in equipment and new buildings.

But while the pharmaceutical drug sector might be expanding, the comments show no overall uptick in manufacturing because of Trump’s tariffs.

“You don’t get the sense that there is this new manufacturing renaissance underway,” Amarnath said.

Uncertainty in tariffs has deterred investments

Based on orders, proclamations and other statements, Trump has taken more than 50 actions on tariffs so far — and that tally doesn’t include the tariff threats he regularly makes on social media or in conversations with reporters but hasn’t formally put in place.

The flurry of announcements, reversals, exemptions and legal challenges — as well as Trump’s decision to bypass Congress to impose tariffs — has made it difficult for smaller manufacturing companies to plan.

For example, Allen Engineering imports its 75-horsepower diesel engines from Germany. Building them in the United States would require a $20 million investment — a huge risk if the status of the tariffs is unclear.

WATCH: Business owner who challenged Trump’s tariffs reacts to Supreme Court decision

Are engine-makers “going to spend that kind of money to move production from Germany to the U.S. when they don’t know what the landscape is going to be in three years?” Allen said. “I don’t know who is going to be in the White House, and what the stance is going to be on these tariffs.”

Joseph Steinberg, an economist at the University of Toronto, said research shows that under the best-case scenario “it would take a decade for manufacturing employment to rise above where it was before tariffs were enacted.”

But Steinberg said “the current situation is nothing like the ‘best case,'” since U.S. trade policy is unsettled and that leaves companies reluctant to expand.

Equipment makers have been hit hard by rising steel costs

About 98% of U.S. manufacturing establishments have fewer than 200 workers, according to Census Bureau data, and don’t have the kind of name-brand recognition or lobbying heft to minimize the damage from tariffs that big players like Apple, General Motors and Ford possess.

The Association of Equipment Manufacturers in February reported that America’s share of global manufacturing severely lags China’s. The group has urged tax credits to offset the expense of tariffs, and specifically called for tariff relief on raw materials, parts and components that cannot be acquired domestically at scale.

Steel tariffs have been a particular concern. Trump imposed them last March and hiked them to 50% in June. They were not affected by the Supreme Court decision.

READ MORE: Trump’s 50% tariffs on steel and aluminum go into effect. Here’s what to know

Trump has credited the tariffs with restoring profits at American steel mills. But they have hurt companies that use that steel, like Calder Brothers in South Carolina, which makes equipment to pave asphalt.

“The steel tariffs were the first thing that got my attention,” said Glen Calder, the company’s president. “My steel pricing jumped 25% two weeks before the tariffs went into effect for domestic steel. The market price just jumped. It has stayed elevated.”

Meanwhile, China’s trade surplus has grown

Part of Trump’s push to expand manufacturing was to help American companies compete against China — a country he plans to visit this spring for talks with its leader, Xi Jinping.

But the U.S. manufacturing trade imbalance rose last year under Trump instead of narrowing. Meanwhile, China’s trade surplus with the world climbed to a record $1.2 trillion.

WATCH: How China is responding to pressure from Trump as trade war brews

This trend exposes one of the big problems with Trump’s tariff strategy, said Lori Wallach, director of the Rethink Trade program at American Economic Liberties Project. She noted that he largely bypassed Congress and failed to address gaps in the World Trade Organization’s rules for the trade frameworks that he negotiated with other countries.

Instead of working with partners to ensure there were penalties for foreign manufacturers with abusive labor practices and unfair subsidies, Trump chose against rallying partners to counter China as a unified group. American manufacturers are at a disadvantage, Wallach argued, because there is not a coalition of nations that can impose penalties for currency manipulation, subsidies and schemes to evade tariffs.

“The general revulsion of this administration to international cooperation means they’re trying to do it alone,” Wallach said.

A free press is a cornerstone of a healthy democracy.

Support trusted journalism and civil dialogue.

Donate now

Source link

Qblox to Begin Manufacturing Quantum Control Electronics in Massachusetts

Insider Brief

• Qblox announced that effective April 1st, it will manufacture quantum control electronics in the United States at a facility in Canton, Massachusetts, in partnership with Prodrive Technologies, and begin shipping products to customers from this location.
• The shift to U.S. manufacturing aims to reduce lead times, improve supply-chain security, and align with U.S. procurement, compliance, and funding requirements while supporting Department of Energy and National Lab research through open-architecture manufacturing.
• The Canton facility will support skilled technical roles across manufacturing, systems integration, logistics, and customer support, building on Qblox’s 2025 expansion into Boston and collaborations with universities, government, and industry partners.

PRESS RELEASE — Qblox, a leading provider of open-architecture quantum control electronics, today announced that effective April 1st, in partnership with Prodrive Technologies, products will be manufactured in the U.S. and will begin shipping to customers from its facility in Canton, MA. 

Building on the company’s 2025 expansion into Boston and its growing collaborations with universities, government, and industry partners, this milestone underscores Qblox’s commitment to strengthening the American quantum ecosystem across innovation, workforce development, and now manufacturing, while further cementing Massachusetts’ role as a hub for quantum innovation.

The shift to manufacturing quantum control systems in the U.S. brings meaningful advantages for customers, including reduced lead times, greater shipping efficiency, improved supply-chain security, and stronger alignment with U.S. procurement, compliance, and funding requirements. Advantages that will be integral for the U.S. to remain competitive in the global quantum industry as it moves closer to full-scale use. 

It also enhances Qblox’s ability to provide onshore support and service while advancing transparent, open-architecture manufacturing that supports the Department of Energy and National Lab research. 

The Canton facility will support skilled technical roles across manufacturing, systems integration, logistics, and customer support, contributing to the growth of a high-tech workforce aligned with the future needs of quantum infrastructure. As public and private investment in quantum technology accelerates nationwide, Qblox’s expansion in Massachusetts reinforces both its role as a trusted infrastructure partner to the American quantum ecosystem and the Commonwealth’s growing reputation as a place where emerging technologies can be developed, built, and deployed at scale.

“Massachusetts is proud to be a global hub for quantum innovation, and Qblox’s investment in manufacturing in Canton strengthens our leadership in the technologies that will define the future,” said Governor Maura Healey. “I want to congratulate the Qblox team on this milestone and am proud that they are growing in Massachusetts, where our world-class research institutions, talented workforce and innovation ecosystem make it the ideal place to build the technologies of tomorrow.”

“Massachusetts is where breakthrough technologies move from research to real-world deployment,” said Economic Development Secretary Eric Paley. “By establishing its U.S. manufacturing and fulfillment hub in Canton, Qblox is strengthening domestic supply chains while tapping into Massachusetts’ deep bench of scientific talent, world-class research institutions and advanced manufacturing capabilities.”

“Building and shipping our systems in the United States allows us to be closer to the researchers, engineers, and institutions driving quantum innovation forward,” said Niels Bultink, Co-founder and CEO of Qblox. “This expansion reflects our long-term investment in the U.S. quantum ecosystem and our belief that proximity matters operationally, strategically, and economically.”

“Advanced technologies like quantum control systems require precise manufacturing and trusted partnerships,” said Pieter Janssen, co-founder & CEO at Prodrive Technologies. “As two companies with roots in the Netherlands and growing operations in Massachusetts, Prodrive and Qblox are proud to work together to strengthen the quantum ecosystem and deliver the reliability, quality, and scalability required for the next generation of quantum innovation.”

“Quantum technology is strategic infrastructure,” said Gregg Carman, General Manager and Head of North America for Qblox. “By manufacturing and shipping from the U.S., we are not only optimizing logistics, but also aligning with the long-term goals of American research institutions and the broader innovation economy. We’re proud to be growing that presence in Massachusetts, which offers a uniquely strong foundation for innovation-driven manufacturing and collaboration.”

Source link

Siemens expands manufacturing footprint in the Carolinas to support data center growth – WSOC TV

Siemens has invested more than $165 million in North Carolina and South Carolina to support the artificial intelligence and data center markets. The investment includes the opening and expansion of several manufacturing sites across both states.

The new facilities are designed to increase the company’s manufacturing capacity in the United States to meet a rise in electrical equipment orders. According to a company news release, the expanded footprint will allow for faster production and delivery of low and medium voltage products to data center operators.

In North Carolina, Siemens is establishing two new all-electric and carbon-neutral facilities. A 131,000-square-foot site in Raleigh is expected to add 100 jobs by the end of 2026.

This location will assemble integrated power delivery solutions, which are prefabricated systems designed to reduce on-site installation time for power infrastructure.

The company is also opening a 101,000-square-foot site in Wendell. This facility will localize the production of medium voltage protection and automation devices. The expansion is expected to create 50 new roles at that location.

In South Carolina, a new 120,000-square-foot facility is opening in Spartanburg.

The site will house a distribution center and lighting panel production. Nearby in Roebuck, Siemens is expanding its existing facility by 22,000 square feet to increase busway production capacity. This expansion includes the addition of a new paint line, epoxy line and plating line.

The combined developments in Spartanburg and Roebuck will create 150 manufacturing roles in Spartanburg County. These investments follow nearly $700 million the company has committed to U.S. manufacturing in recent years, including expansions in Pomona, Calif., and Fort Worth, Texas.

The expansion of the Siemens Electrification and Automation U.S. headquarters in Wendell is expected to create more than 200 additional jobs by 2028. This growth will specifically support expanded local switchgear production.

VIDEO: Proposed data center regulations spark debate in York County

Proposed data center regulations spark debate in York County

©2026 Cox Media Group

Source link

Siemens Invests $165M for U.S. Data Center Manufacturing

Siemens has invested more than $165 million across North and South Carolina to support America’s rapidly accelerating AI and data center markets. The new and expanded sites directly support Siemens’ record levels of data center-related electrical equipment orders while also increasing the company’s US manufacturing capacity.These expanded facilities will enable faster production, assembly, and delivery of essential low and medium voltage products to customers. From protection and automation devices manufactured in Wendell, North Carolina, to busway systems produced in Roebuck, South Carolina, these solutions provide the electrical backbone needed to rapidly scale AI data centers and AI factories across the United States. These investments build on nearly $700 million Siemens has committed over the past several years to expand local U.S. manufacturing capacity, including new and expanded electrical products facilities in Pomona, California, and Fort Worth, Texas. “Customer demand is at an all-time high as advanced infrastructure upgrades are needed to meet the power requirements from increasing AI workloads,” said Ruth Gratzke, President of Siemens Smart Infrastructure U.S. “Through sustained investment in U.S. manufacturing, Siemens is enhancing its capacity to meet the needs of data center and AI factory customers during this transformative phase of the AI industrial revolution, underscoring our long‑standing commitment to American made solutions.”In North Carolina, Siemens is growing its footprint with two new all-electric, carbon�neutral facilities. In Raleigh, the brand new 131,000-square-foot facility will add 100 jobs by the end of the year and will assemble Siemens’ integrated power delivery solutions. These prefabricated systems significantly reduce on-site installation time for critical power infrastructure, helping data center operators bring capacity online faster. In Wendell, a new 101,000-square-foot site will localize production of medium voltage protection and automation devices while adding 50 new roles. Lastly, Siemens’ Wendell-based Electrification and Automation U.S. headquarters will expand local switchgear production, creating more than 200 additional jobs at the facility by 2028. In South Carolina, Siemens is opening a new 120,000-square-foot facility in Spartanburg that will house the company’s lighting panel production and distribution center. Nearby in Roebuck, the company’s current facility will also add 22,000 square feet. This will increase busway production capacity significantly along with additional fabrication capabilities. The expanded facility will feature a new paint line, epoxy line, and an expanded plating line. Together, the Spartanburg and Roebuck facilities will add 150 new manufacturing roles to Spartanburg County. “Siemens’ investment in North and South Carolina will expand America’s ability to build the critical infrastructure that powers our grid, while also creating hundreds of American jobs,” said U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright. “The Trump Administration remains committed to unleashing the affordable, reliable, and secure power needed to power the future of American innovation and prosperity.”These electrical products, together with Siemens’ simulation, automation and cooling optimization portfolios create a chip-to-grid-to-buildings solution that reshapes the infrastructure powering AI. Together these technologies ensure efficiency and resiliency for the data center industry as well as neighboring communities across the country.As workforce development is as critical as production capacity for the future of AI infrastructure, the Siemens Foundation recently launched Careers Electric™, a national initiative designed to expand access to high-quality electrical training and create clear pathways to well-paying, in-demand electrical careers. Careers Electric™ launched in North Carolina with a $9.25 million investment from the Siemens Foundation, in partnership with state leaders, education institutions, and national workforce organizations. Together, through increased manufacturing capacity, technology development and workforce training initiatives, Siemens remains committed to aiding the U.S. in its position as a leader in innovation.For more information on Siemens’ data center solutions, visit here.

Source link

Skild AI Partners with Foxconn, ABB, Universal Robots for Industrial AI in 2026 – News and Statistics

Mar 16, 2026

According to Reuters, Skild AI will deploy its artificial intelligence model in robots operating on Foxconn assembly lines in Houston. These lines are involved in the construction of Nvidia‘s Blackwell GPU server racks. The companies characterized this as an initial commercial use of a generalized physical AI system.

The startup, which has financial backing from Nvidia and SoftBank, announced it would also collaborate with ABB Robotics and Universal Robots. The goal is to integrate its software into a wide range of industrial robots, providing what it terms a general-purpose brain for machinery. Skild AI stated its model is designed to overcome a major constraint of existing robotics, which are often dedicated to one specific task and need significant reprogramming for any change.

Partnerships with ABB and Teradyne‘s Universal Robots unit are aimed at increasing the volume of data for system training by embedding the software into their robots. The CEO of Skild AI indicated that working with original equipment manufacturers that have vast existing robot deployments creates a pathway for significant scaling and establishes a data feedback cycle.

These developments occur as the United States intensifies initiatives to restore its domestic manufacturing base. In 2025, new U.S. production investments totaling approximately $1.2 trillion were announced, primarily in electronics, pharmaceuticals, and semiconductors. Industry leaders note that the large-scale return of advanced manufacturing to the country will rely substantially on automation.

Nvidia, a key supporter of Skild AI, previously stated its intention to manufacture AI supercomputers completely within the United States. A company executive emphasized that with substantial infrastructure investment planned for the coming years, factories will require greater autonomy.

In a related move, SoftBank announced in October its agreement to purchase ABB’s robotics division. That transaction is anticipated to be finalized around the middle to end of 2026. Skild AI itself secured $1.4 billion in a financing round led by Nvidia and SoftBank earlier this year, resulting in a valuation exceeding $14 billion.

This report provides a comprehensive view of the industrial robot industry in the United States, tracking demand, supply, and trade flows across the national value chain. It explains how demand across key channels and end-use segments shapes consumption patterns, while also mapping the role of input availability, production efficiency, and regulatory standards on supply.

Beyond headline metrics, the study benchmarks prices, margins, and trade routes so you can see where value is created and how it moves between domestic suppliers and international partners. The analysis is designed to support strategic planning, market entry, portfolio prioritization, and risk management in the industrial robot landscape in the United States.

Quick navigation

Key findings

• Domestic demand is shaped by both household and industrial usage, with trade flows linking local supply to imports and exports.
• Pricing dynamics reflect unit values, freight costs, exchange rates, and regulatory shifts that affect sourcing decisions.
• Supply depends on input availability and production efficiency, creating a distinct national cost curve.
• Market concentration varies by segment, creating different competitive landscapes and entry barriers.
• The 2035 outlook highlights where capacity investment and demand growth are most aligned within the country.

Report scope

The report combines market sizing with trade intelligence and price analytics for the United States. It covers both historical performance and the forward outlook to 2035, allowing you to compare cycles, structural shifts, and policy impacts.

• Market size and growth in value and volume terms
• Consumption structure by end-use segments
• Production capacity, output, and cost dynamics
• Trade flows, exporters, importers, and balances
• Price benchmarks, unit values, and margin signals
• Competitive context and market entry conditions

Product coverage

• Prodcom 28993935 – Industrial robots for multiple uses (excluding robots designed to perform a specific function (e.g. lifting, handling, loading or unloading))

Country coverage

Country profile and benchmarks

This report provides a consistent view of market size, trade balance, prices, and per-capita indicators for the United States. The profile highlights demand structure and trade position, enabling benchmarking against regional and global peers.

Methodology

The analysis is built on a multi-source framework that combines official statistics, trade records, company disclosures, and expert validation. Data are standardized, reconciled, and cross-checked to ensure consistency across time series.

• International trade data (exports, imports, and mirror statistics)
• National production and consumption statistics
• Company-level information from financial filings and public releases
• Price series and unit value benchmarks
• Analyst review, outlier checks, and time-series validation

All data are normalized to a common product definition and mapped to a consistent set of codes. This ensures that comparisons across time are aligned and actionable.

Forecasts to 2035

The forecast horizon extends to 2035 and is based on a structured model that links industrial robot demand and supply to macroeconomic indicators, trade patterns, and sector-specific drivers. The model captures both cyclical and structural factors and reflects known policy and technology shifts in the United States.

• Historical baseline: 2012-2025
• Forecast horizon: 2026-2035
• Scenario-based sensitivity to income growth, substitution, and regulation
• Capacity and investment outlook for major producing companies

Each projection is built from national historical patterns and the broader regional context, allowing the report to show where growth is concentrated and where risks are elevated.

Price analysis and trade dynamics

Prices are analyzed in detail, including export and import unit values, regional spreads, and changes in trade costs. The report highlights how seasonality, freight rates, exchange rates, and supply disruptions influence pricing and margins.

• Price benchmarks by country and sub-region
• Export and import unit value trends
• Seasonality and calendar effects in trade flows
• Price outlook to 2035 under baseline assumptions

Profiles of market participants

Key producers, exporters, and distributors are profiled with a focus on their operational scale, geographic footprint, product mix, and market positioning. This helps identify competitive pressure points, partnership opportunities, and routes to differentiation.

• Business focus and production capabilities
• Geographic reach and distribution networks
• Cost structure and pricing strategy indicators
• Compliance, certification, and sustainability context

How to use this report

• Quantify domestic demand and identify the most attractive segments
• Evaluate export opportunities and prioritize target destinations
• Track price dynamics and protect margins
• Benchmark performance against leading competitors
• Build evidence-based forecasts for investment decisions

This report is designed for manufacturers, distributors, importers, wholesalers, investors, and advisors who need a clear, data-driven picture of industrial robot dynamics in the United States.

FAQ

What is included in the industrial robot market in the United States?

The market size aggregates consumption and trade data, presented in both value and volume terms.

How are the forecasts to 2035 built?

The projections combine historical trends with macroeconomic indicators, trade dynamics, and sector-specific drivers.

Does the report cover prices and margins?

Yes, it includes export and import unit values, regional spreads, and a pricing outlook to 2035.

Which benchmarks are included?

The report benchmarks market size, trade balance, prices, and per-capita indicators for the United States.

Can this report support market entry decisions?

Yes, it highlights demand hotspots, trade routes, pricing trends, and competitive context.

1. 1. INTRODUCTION

   Making Data-Driven Decisions to Grow Your Business

   1. REPORT DESCRIPTION
   2. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY AND THE AI PLATFORM
   3. DATA-DRIVEN DECISIONS FOR YOUR BUSINESS
   4. GLOSSARY AND SPECIFIC TERMS

2. 2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

   A Quick Overview of Market Performance

   1. KEY FINDINGS
   2. MARKET TRENDSThis Chapter is Available Only for the Professional EditionPRO

3. 3. MARKET OVERVIEW

   Understanding the Current State of The Market and its Prospects

   1. MARKET SIZE: HISTORICAL DATA (2012–2025) AND FORECAST (2026–2035)
   2. MARKET STRUCTURE: HISTORICAL DATA (2012–2025) AND FORECAST (2026–2035)
   3. TRADE BALANCE: HISTORICAL DATA (2012–2025) AND FORECAST (2026–2035)
   4. PER CAPITA CONSUMPTION: HISTORICAL DATA (2012–2025) AND FORECAST (2026–2035)
   5. MARKET FORECAST TO 2035

4. 4. MOST PROMISING PRODUCTS FOR DIVERSIFICATION

   Finding New Products to Diversify Your Business

   1. TOP PRODUCTS TO DIVERSIFY YOUR BUSINESS
   2. BEST-SELLING PRODUCTS
   3. MOST CONSUMED PRODUCTS
   4. MOST TRADED PRODUCTS
   5. MOST PROFITABLE PRODUCTS FOR EXPORTS

5. 5. MOST PROMISING SUPPLYING COUNTRIES

   Choosing the Best Countries to Establish Your Sustainable Supply Chain

   1. TOP COUNTRIES TO SOURCE YOUR PRODUCT
   2. TOP PRODUCING COUNTRIES
   3. TOP EXPORTING COUNTRIES
   4. LOW-COST EXPORTING COUNTRIES

6. 6. MOST PROMISING OVERSEAS MARKETS

   Choosing the Best Countries to Boost Your Export

   1. TOP OVERSEAS MARKETS FOR EXPORTING YOUR PRODUCT
   2. TOP CONSUMING MARKETS
   3. UNSATURATED MARKETS
   4. TOP IMPORTING MARKETS
   5. MOST PROFITABLE MARKETS

7. 7. PRODUCTION

   The Latest Trends and Insights into The Industry

   1. PRODUCTION VOLUME AND VALUE: HISTORICAL DATA (2012–2025) AND FORECAST (2026–2035)

8. 8. IMPORTS

   The Largest Import Supplying Countries

   1. IMPORTS: HISTORICAL DATA (2012–2025) AND FORECAST (2026–2035)
   2. IMPORTS BY COUNTRY: HISTORICAL DATA (2012–2025)
   3. IMPORT PRICES BY COUNTRY: HISTORICAL DATA (2012–2025)

9. 9. EXPORTS

   The Largest Destinations for Exports

   1. EXPORTS: HISTORICAL DATA (2012–2025) AND FORECAST (2026–2035)
   2. EXPORTS BY COUNTRY: HISTORICAL DATA (2012–2025)
   3. EXPORT PRICES BY COUNTRY: HISTORICAL DATA (2012–2025)

10. 10. PROFILES OF MAJOR PRODUCERS

    The Largest Producers on The Market and Their Profiles

11. LIST OF TABLES

    1. Key Findings In 2025
    2. Market Volume, In Physical Terms: Historical Data (2012–2025) and Forecast (2026–2035)
    3. Market Value: Historical Data (2012–2025) and Forecast (2026–2035)
    4. Per Capita Consumption: Historical Data (2012–2025) and Forecast (2026–2035)
    5. Imports, In Physical Terms, By Country, 2012–2025
    6. Imports, In Value Terms, By Country, 2012–2025
    7. Import Prices, By Country, 2012–2025
    8. Exports, In Physical Terms, By Country, 2012–2025
    9. Exports, In Value Terms, By Country, 2012–2025
    10. Export Prices, By Country, 2012–2025

12. LIST OF FIGURES

    1. Market Volume, In Physical Terms: Historical Data (2012–2025) and Forecast (2026–2035)
    2. Market Value: Historical Data (2012–2025) and Forecast (2026–2035)
    3. Market Structure – Domestic Supply vs. Imports, in Physical Terms: Historical Data (2012–2025) and Forecast (2026–2035)
    4. Market Structure – Domestic Supply vs. Imports, in Value Terms: Historical Data (2012–2025) and Forecast (2026–2035)
    5. Trade Balance, In Physical Terms: Historical Data (2012–2025) and Forecast (2026–2035)
    6. Trade Balance, In Value Terms: Historical Data (2012–2025) and Forecast (2026–2035)
    7. Per Capita Consumption: Historical Data (2012–2025) and Forecast (2026–2035)
    8. Market Volume Forecast to 2035
    9. Market Value Forecast to 2035
    10. Market Size and Growth, By Product
    11. Average Per Capita Consumption, By Product
    12. Exports and Growth, By Product
    13. Export Prices and Growth, By Product
    14. Production Volume and Growth
    15. Exports and Growth
    16. Export Prices and Growth
    17. Market Size and Growth
    18. Per Capita Consumption
    19. Imports and Growth
    20. Import Prices
    21. Production, In Physical Terms: Historical Data (2012–2025) and Forecast (2026–2035)
    22. Production, In Value Terms: Historical Data (2012–2025) and Forecast (2026–2035)
    23. Imports, In Physical Terms: Historical Data (2012–2025) and Forecast (2026–2035)
    24. Imports, In Value Terms: Historical Data (2012–2025) and Forecast (2026–2035)
    25. Imports, In Physical Terms, By Country, 2025
    26. Imports, In Physical Terms, By Country, 2012–2025
    27. Imports, In Value Terms, By Country, 2012–2025
    28. Import Prices, By Country, 2012–2025
    29. Exports, In Physical Terms: Historical Data (2012–2025) and Forecast (2026–2035)
    30. Exports, In Value Terms: Historical Data (2012–2025) and Forecast (2026–2035)
    31. Exports, In Physical Terms, By Country, 2025
    32. Exports, In Physical Terms, By Country, 2012–2025
    33. Exports, In Value Terms, By Country, 2012–2025
    34. Export Prices, By Country, 2012–2025

Source link

US manufacturing output rises marginally in February

WASHINGTON: US factory production increased marginally in February as strength in motor vehicle output ‌was ⁠offset ⁠by weakness in machinery, data showed on Monday.

Manufacturing output rose 0.2% last month after ⁠an upwardly revised ‌0.8% gain in January, ⁠the Federal Reserve said.

Also Read: Trump may bring back tariffs ‘in another form’
Economists polled ​by Reuters had ​forecast production for the sector, which accounts for 10.1% ‌of the economy, rising 0.1% after ​a ​previously ⁠reported 0.6% rise in January. Production at factories advanced ​1.3% year-on-year in February.



Source link

Poilievre unveils auto plan aiming for tariff-free access to U.S. market

Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre unveiled the party’s most substantial auto strategy to date under his leadership, which he says will both bring back production to Canada and be “highly attractive” to partners south of the border.

“Canada’s auto sector must stay alive and it must have access to the U.S. to do so,” Poilievre said while in Windsor, Ont., on Sunday.  

Poilievre said he’d like to institute a tariff-free auto pact and has a plan to restore Canada’s auto production to two million cars per year over the next 10 years. 

Also included in the plan is a call to remove the GST on all Canadian-made vehicles, something the NDP and Conservatives proposed during the 2025 general election campaign. 

The proposal was announced amid Poilievre’s first visit to the United States since U.S. President Donald Trump launched his trade war, a significant marker in the Conservative leader’s shifting focus on global trade pressures brought about by the Trump administration. 

“He’s going down there to sell Canada, it’s what we have to do,” Conservative labour critic Kyle Seeback told Rosemary Barton Live. 

Seeback said the purpose of the trip is not to give the impression that there are two prime ministers in Canada.

Rather, he said, with the CUSMA (Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement) review coming up, Poilievre is making the case to U.S. business leaders about the importance of the trading relationship and how tariffs can hurt both countries.

WATCH | Conservative labour critic on the party’s auto plan, Poilievre’s U.S. trip:

Federal Conservatives pitch new auto strategy as tariffs roil industry

Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre has announced a plan for the hard-hit auto sector that aims to secure tariff-free access to the U.S. market and boost Canada’s auto production. Chief political correspondent Rosemary Barton speaks with Conservative MP Kyle Seeback, the party’s labour critic, about the plan, as well as Poilievre’s U.S. trip.

Will Trump agree?

At the heart of this auto strategy is the push to get Trump to drop tariffs on Canada by selling this strategy as a better way to restore U.S. manufacturing. 

This push rests on the assumption that Trump is open to solving its trade relationship with Canada, despite there being a lack of evidence to suggest willingness on the part of the administration. 

Asked how he’d get Trump to give the green light, Poilievre says his plan addresses the president’s desire to repatriate production to the U.S. and would see a “massive production gain” on both sides of the border.  

Poilievre meets with workers and politicians at Cavalier Tool and Manufacturing in Windsor, Ont., on Sunday. (Pratyush Dayal/CBC)

A 1-for-1 car deal

Poilievre laid out a one-for-one deal, where for every car manufactured in Canada, he said, that same producer would get a car to sell duty free from a partner in CUSMA. 

This can be sold as a “win, win,” said Seeback. 

“It’s a better way for the United States to reshore the auto manufacturing in their country while preserving their best export market for autos, which is Canada.”

Seeback says this strategy harkens back to the 1965 auto pact that kick-started free trade between Canada and the U.S., prior to the North American Free Trade Agreement. 

Seeback said this new version of the auto pact would position Canada to be able to harmonize with the U.S. on Chinese electric vehicle policy, part of Poilievre’s strategy to bring “maximum leverage” to the CUSMA review.

“When you put these things together, helping them restore their auto manufacturing, preserving the Canadian market and better alignment on things like Chinese electric vehicles, we actually think there’s an opportunity to get that deal,” said Seeback. 

The federal government recently struck a deal with China to bring tariff relief for Canada’s agricultural and seafood sectors.

In a move that broke ranks with the U.S., Prime Minister Mark Carney agreed to allow up to 49,000 Chinese electric vehicles into Canada, lowering a 100 per cent tariff on imports, imposed in 2024, back to six per cent. 

A tale of three strategies 

The U.S. strategy has been focused on protecting its big three automakers: General Motors, Ford Motor Company and Stellantis. 

To thwart Trump’s protectionist policies, Carney’s approach has been to diversify Canada’s trading partners and look to attract European, Japanese and Korean automakers to Canada. 

Now, more than a year after Trump returned to office, Poilievre is looking to show his plan for dealing with the White House.

For decades, Canada’s sales pitch to the world has rested on having tariff-free access to the U.S. market. Seeback said that if that’s not the case, there’s “not a single producer in the world” that will come to Canada to start new production.

Seeback calls Carney’s approach “managed decline” and said he does not believe it will work. 

Poilievre said that even Mexico would have to accept the plan to avoid ending up with something “much worse.” 

More U.S. meetings ahead

On Friday, Poilievre was in Detroit to meet with senior executives of General Motors and Ford. He crossed the Detroit River back into Canada Sunday to make his auto strategy announcement in Windsor.

His U.S. travel will continue with stops in Texas and New York, with no visit planned for the U.S. capital. 

In an interview on The Paul Wells Show podcast, Poilievre said he updated Carney about his travel plans on the margins on Question Period last Wednesday and plans to debrief him once he returns.

Source link

After China outlay, Lilly plugs $126M into Japan manufacturing plant expansion

While much of the company’s recent focus has remained on beefing up its U.S. infrastructure, Eli Lilly has for the second time this week made moves to raise capacity for its medicines overseas, and once again in Asia. 

The company on Thursday unveiled a 20 billion Japanese yen (nearly $126 million) expansion at its Seishin plant in Kobe, Japan, where Lilly’s local unit plans to install a fresh production line and add a new warehouse by 2028, according to a Japanese-language press release (PDF). 

Lilly did not clarify which drugs the expansion will support, although Nikkei Asia reported on March 12 that the project will bolster manufacturing of medicines for diabetes and obesity. 

The Seishin plant was established in 1981 and currently boasts a headcount of around 315 employees, serving as Lilly’s lone in-house production facility in Japan, according to the release. 

Aside from the new manufacturing line and storage space, Lilly said the investment will promote digitalization and process optimization at the plant to help supply the Japanese market. 

Citing “increasing demand” in the country, Lilly noted that “it is important for us to respond quickly and flexibly to future supply expansions.”

The company pointed out that it previously invested 7 billion yen (around $44 million) at the Seishin facility between 2022 and 2025, which paved the way for new automated device sorting machines, quality testing lab improvements, a new factory building and a fresh packaging line. 

“This additional investment was made in response to the need for further expansion of our supply capacity,” Lilly said of the latest outlay. 

The plant currently occupies a footprint of 23,000 square meters (247,570 square feet) and is primarily involved in analytical testing, inspection and packaging of Lilly products, according to the company’s announcement. 

With its local partner Mitsubishi Tanabe, Lilly has in recent years launched its dual GIP/GLP-1 med tirzepatide across both diabetes and obesity (PDF) indications in Japan, and the company also won approval for its Alzheimer’s disease med Kisunla in the country back in 2024. 

Lilly’s Japan outlay comes on the heels of a major $3 billion investment in the company’s manufacturing operations in China, where the pharma giant has pledged to set up local production for oral solid drugs, and in particular its GLP-1 pill for obesity orforglipron, which is under regulatory review in multiple parts of the world. 

The project, which will play out over a decade, will also see Lilly work with multiple local manufacturing partners, with the first named being Beijing-based CDMO Pharmaron. 

The Indianapolis pharma has also recently committed to a $500 million investment in South Korea. Instead of manufacturing, the money is meant to attract clinical trials to the country, while also support opening an incubator as part of the Lilly Gateway Labs.

Back in the U.S., Eli Lilly has committed to multiple high-profile plant builds in recent months, most recently with plans for a $3.5 billion injectables and device facility in Pennsylvania. Prior to that, the company telegraphed new manufacturing sites in Virginia, Texas and Alabama. 

Those investments have arrived amid a spate of similar U.S. moves by Big Pharma companies looking to navigate the Trump administration’s pharmaceutical import tariff threats. 

Source link

Oregon Growers Keeps its Food Manufacturing Local

Oregon Growers’ flagship Marionberry Jam fruit spread. | Photo courtesy Oregon Growers

This company makes a truly Pacific Northwest product, from orchard to jar.

In Oregon’s Hood River Valley, fruit isn’t just grown; it’s part of the region’s identity. Orchards line the hillsides, family farms stretch across generations and the harvest has long been tied to the local economy.

Oregon Growers was built around that reality.

Founded in 2003 by Dave Gee, the company started with a simple goal: Capture the bounty of the Hood River Valley and turn it into something people could enjoy year-round. Working directly with nearby farms and orchards, Oregon Growers began producing jams, fruit butters and other specialty foods made from the region’s harvest.

More than two decades later, that same approach still defines the business.

Built on Local Agriculture, and Made in Oregon

To better understand how the company operates I spoke with Lisa Schlecht, who handles wholesale customer service and sales support there, about its approach to local sourcing, domestic production and long-standing partnerships with growers.

 Oregon Growers’ products are “farm direct,” Schlecht explained. “Their quality and great taste is the direct result of the exceptional fruit we use. We seek out the growers who not only produce the best-tasting fruit, but who also use sustainable growing practices.”

The company’s manufacturing footprint is just as local as its sourcing, according to Schlecht. Oregon Growers operates three production facilities in Oregon, where the fruit is turned into finished products. Keeping production close to home allows the company to maintain quality control, manage food safety closely and build long-term partnerships with growers.

It also means the economic impact stays local. When Oregon Growers buys fruit from nearby farms and produces its goods in-state, it supports jobs and business activity across the region, whether it’s in agriculture or in production and distribution.

The Realities of Domestic Supply Chains

Like many U.S.-based manufacturers, Oregon Growers faces challenges when it comes to maintaining a fully domestic supply chain.

Availability and pricing can be unpredictable, particularly in agriculture where harvests vary year to year. Competing on cost with imports can also put pressure on companies trying to keep sourcing and production in the United States.

Even so, Oregon Growers continues to prioritize American-grown ingredients and regional partnerships, choosing consistency, quality and community impact over the lowest possible cost.

Why It Matters

For Oregon Growers, producing food in the United States isn’t just a logistical decision, it’s a reflection of what the company values.

Keeping sourcing and production domestic helps support sustainable growing practices, strengthens local economies and results in products the company believes are higher quality. It also contributes to a more stable and resilient food system at a time when global supply chains can be unpredictable.

For consumers, those choices show up in the product itself.

If there’s one product that captures the company’s roots it’s the Marionberry Jam fruit spread, its flagship jam and a staple of Oregon agriculture. (My personal favorite!)

It’s a simple product, but it tells a larger story: one about American farms, domestic food production and the value of keeping both close to home.

Oregon Growers is a reminder that manufacturing in the United States doesn’t just happen on factory floors. It also happens in kitchens, canneries and production facilities that turn local crops into finished goods, supporting farmers, workers and communities along the way.

The Alliance for American Manufacturing does not receive a commission from purchases made through the above links, nor was the organization or author paid for favorable coverage.

Labeling Note: This story is intended to highlight companies that support American jobs and that make great products in the United States. We rely on the companies listed to provide accurate information regarding their domestic operations and their products. Each company featured is individually responsible for labeling and advertising their products according to applicable standards, such as the Federal Trade Commission’s “Made in USA” standard or California’s “Made in USA” labeling law. We do not review individual products for compliance or claim that because a company is listed in the guide that their products comply with specific labeling or advertising standards. Our focus is on supporting companies that create American jobs.

For more on the Federal Trade Commission’s standards for “Made in USA” claims and California’s “Made in USA” labeling law, please also read this guest post by Dustin Painter and Kristi Wolff of Kelly Drye & Warren, LLP.

Source link